Join your neighbors

Stay informed.
Stand together.

Get neighborhood updates from Friends of Monterey Highlands Association.

Your address helps us understand which Monterey Park neighborhoods are represented. FOMHA will not sell your information.

Tell them twice.

We already voted NO to high-density, high-rise housing.

Vote NO on the HOME Act.

Illustrative concept showing high-rise housing across the Monterey Highlands landscape
Illustrative advocacy concept — not a City rendering, an approved project or a prediction of allowable height.

Monterey Park · November 3, 2026

HOME Act destroys
our neighborhoods

Voters rejected housing on Corporate Center Drive in 2020;
HOME act doubles down and adds high density housing on Monterey Pass Road.

HOME act buries Monterey Highlands under high-rise housing

01 / We warned you in 2020

We defeated Measure II. Now sneaky City Hall is trying it again.

City Hall is ignoring the will of the people.

Vacant-to-Vibrant defies the citizens who defeated high-density housing overlays in 2020.

City map showing the proposed HOME housing overlay areas on Corporate Center Drive and Monterey Pass Road
Proposed HOME housing overlay · Purple cross-hatching marks HOME-eligible territory
Original 2020 Friends of Monterey Highlands Association poster opposing Measure II
Original Friends of Monterey Highlands Association poster · 2020

See what’s at stake

What HOME act does to you

These are the nightmares we are facing. Vote NO on the HOME Act to preserve your views and quality of life.

View 01

New high density housing can tower over our homes.

Today
Existing single-family neighborhood street in Monterey Highlands
Illustrative concept
Illustrative concept of high-rise housing behind the neighborhood
View 02

High rise development ruins the landscape and jams traffic.

Today
Existing street looking toward a Monterey Park hillside
Illustrative concept
Illustrative concept of residential towers beside the same street
View 03

What about YOUR tranquility and property values?

Today
Existing panorama of homes and hillside
Illustrative concept
Illustrative concept of mixed-use towers across the same panorama

Concept images are advocacy visualizations—not City renderings, predictions of allowable height or depictions of an approved project.

02 / Read the map

Two neighborhoods overwhelmed with rampant over-development

Purple cross-hatching marks the commercial and industrial areas the HOME map identifies as eligible.

Monterey Pass RoadCorporate CenterHighlands School hillBrightwood School hill
Close-up of proposed HOME overlay areas around Corporate Center Drive and the western end of Monterey Pass Road
Close-up 01 · Corporate Center Drive and western Monterey Pass Road
Close-up of proposed HOME overlay areas along Monterey Pass Road below Monterey Highlands Elementary School
Close-up 02 · Monterey Pass Road below Highlands School hill

The land-use conflict

The HOME map does not match the plan voters approved.

Measure JJ’s voter-approved 2040 map assigns Corporate Center to Corporate Center uses and Monterey Pass Road to Innovation / Technology uses—not housing. HOME’s own text says it must amend JJ, create a new housing designation and supersede conflicting voter-approved rules.

The HOME overlay has no legal force today. The City needs voters to change JJ before the Council can activate HOME or approve a project under it.

Honor the 2040 plan through 2040. “2040” is the plan’s horizon—not a statutory moratorium—but it is the long-range plan voters authorized. It should remain intact unless voters themselves choose to replace it.

03 / Key changes to land-use policy

New on Monterey Pass.
Back on Corporate Center.

Measure II put housing overlays on Corporate Center. The people said NO housing overlays and defeated Measure II. Measure JJ removed them. HOME returns there and reaches farther—onto Monterey Pass Road.

New territory

Monterey Pass Road

Approved use: Innovation / Technology

The voter-approved plan identifies Monterey Pass for technology-oriented, creative-industry, service and emerging-industry businesses. The City currently markets it for light manufacturing.

HOME adds eligibility for multifamily, townhomes, condominiums and housing mixed with other uses.

Back again

Corporate Center

Approved use: Corporate Center

The voter-approved plan calls this a premier regional location for high-rise office, hospitality, R&D, corporate headquarters and conference facilities.

HOME restores housing eligibility that the City removed after Measure II was defeated.

HOME would authorize eligibility, not approve a particular project. A parcel overlay would still require Planning Commission review, public hearings and City Council approval.

What the measure would authorize

Housing eligibility near existing hillside neighborhoods

HOME would create a land-use designation allowing multifamily housing—including apartments, condominiums and townhomes—and projects mixing housing with other uses on mapped parcels. The mapped Corporate Center and Monterey Pass areas sit beside existing single-family hillside streets.

Fact check: The ballot measure would not approve a specific high-rise “by right.” It would establish housing eligibility; later parcel designation and project review would still require the procedures stated in the measure.

Read the HOME ballot text ↗

Demand answers first

No impact study?
NO over-development!

The ballot measure changes land-use eligibility. Before voters grant that authority, the City should disclose what future implementation could mean for both school hills.

01

Views & scale

Taller residential and mixed-use projects could replace open sky, hillside views and the scale residents see today.

02

More car trips

More homes can mean more daily trips on Monterey Pass, Corporate Center, Floral, Fremont and neighborhood cut-throughs.

03

Transit gap

These are freeway-edge employment corridors, not rail-station districts. Where is the plan to prevent added car dependence?

04

Police & fire

More residents and structures increase service demand and hillside fire and evacuation complexity. Show the staffing and response-time plan first.

05

Schools

The map reaches the hills around Monterey Highlands and Brightwood schools. Disclose enrollment and capacity impacts before changing eligibility.

06

Infrastructure

Show the water, sewer, stormwater, road, slope-stability and evacuation capacity before voters give the Council this authority.

07

Property & character

Do not gamble with neighborhood expectations, views and traffic exposure without parcel-specific height, setback and transition limits.

08

Public safety

Population and activity increase calls for service. Publish a police staffing, prevention and response plan—not unsupported promises about crime.

Know the history

The City admitted they know what happened. They’ve heard the will of the people, but they’re doing their tricks anyway.

The strongest case uses the City’s words, not ours.

  1. March 2020

    Voters rejected Measure II.

    Measure II was defeated by Monterey Park voters. It included housing overlays in the Corporate Center Drive area.

    “Measure II was not approved by the voters.” ↗

    “This revised Plan will remove all housing overlays on Corporate Center Dr. which were included in the previous plan and which were rejected by voters in the March 2020 election.”

    City of Monterey Park · October 2020 newsletter ↗
  2. October 2020

    The City removed Corporate Center housing overlays.

    The City told residents the revised plan removed overlays that voters rejected in March.

    “This revised Plan will remove all housing overlays on Corporate Center Dr.” ↗
  3. November 2020

    Voters approved revised Measure JJ.

    Final result: 9,021 YES to 8,326 NO.

    “This Measure is NOT the same as Measure II.” ↗
  4. November 2026

    HOME returns—and expands.

    It again identifies Corporate Center for housing eligibility and adds large stretches of Monterey Pass Road.

04 / A public-land choice

Why are we rebuilding prisons instead of houses on this land?

That question needs an accurate, current answer. Los Angeles County says the women’s jail was severely damaged in the 1994 Northridge earthquake. A separate site record dates its formal closure to 1997 and describes later use primarily as a filming location.

Satellite view · Google Maps
Entrance sign at the former Sybil Brand Institute
Former institute entrance · Center for Land Use Interpretation ↗
Interior visiting area at the former Sybil Brand Institute
Former visiting area · Center for Land Use Interpretation ↗

Closure date: two records

Damaged in 1994; formally closed in 1997

The County says inmate housing ended there after the 1994 earthquake. The Center for Land Use Interpretation identifies 1997 as the facility’s formal closure year.

Old prison-reopening proposal

A 2001 plan proposed 900 jail beds

California’s CEQAnet records a 2001 Sheriff’s Department proposal to renovate the existing structures and add parking so the facility could reopen for approximately 900 women. That 25-year-old record does not establish that construction is approved or underway today.

A housing alternative

Should the County evaluate housing here?

Before pursuing detention reuse, the County can publicly compare demolition, environmental remediation, infrastructure, emergency access, housing capacity and other public uses for this 23.18-acre site.

The bottom line

HOME asks voters to override the 2040 plan, put housing back on Corporate Center and divide our low-build homes with high-density high-rises.

05 / Verify every claim

Read the official record